[mattmatumbo]

Originally Posted by Zeran

of course race is a social construction. i thought that was obvious?

Seconded.

I could look it up in the OED, but I'm very certain the term "race" didn't arise in the English language prior to the 16th century (the same century slavery became an economic market).

[mattmatumbo]

Originally Posted by caveBEAR

HAARP isn't dangerous, you're just a skittish little kitty.

HAARP: "its purpose seems deeply mysterious to the scientifically uninformed" [1].

I guess I should've quoted the person you quoted since you aren't misinformed, haha.

[mattmatumbo]

Is this political?

[mattmatumbo]

Next up to bat, how were the Bosnian Pyramids made?

by the earth

[mattmatumbo]

Originally Posted by Jake Gyllenhaal

According to this history textbook entitled "Where's Waldo?," human beings built the pyramids while a fellow named Waldo just walked around without lifting a finger.

The hell is going on with the two pyramids in the back?

[mattmatumbo]

God damn, how can people keep being so mislead?

media

[mattmatumbo]

Originally Posted by Chris92

To whom in this thread are you referring?

NewageofHorus

[mattmatumbo]

Originally Posted by NewAgeofHorus

"a class III"; or "a class II device that is implantable, life supporting or life-sustaining" (HR 4872, pg.1014, lines 15-17; similar language is found in HR 3962, pg.1502, lines 16-17), and to put the safety data into a publicly accessible electronic database..."the term 'data' refers to information respecting a device described in paragraph (1), including claims data, patient survey data, standardized analytic files that allow for the pooling and analysis of data from disparate data environments, electronic health records, and any other data deemed appropriate by the Secretary." (HR 4872, pg. 1017, line 3-9; HR 3962, pg. 1505, line 13-18).

Sounds like a pace maker.

Unless these electronic IDs are somehow "life supporting or life-sustaining."

Therefore, "the term 'data' refers to information respecting a device described in paragraph 1," which I underlined for you.

Sounds like this bill wants to keep tabs on companies' products which stay in your body. Not on the patient.

[mattmatumbo]

Originally Posted by Chris92

Unfortunately, I'm not sure we can blame his stupidity on the the usual right-wing media suspects. His idiocy is of a peculiarly original nature.

Yes, unfortunately it stems from his ability to read into and use "slippery slope" fallacies from actual laws haha. At least he actually cites them, despite misinterpreting their information.

[mattmatumbo]

Originally Posted by NewAgeofHorus

I never said that my first post had to do with the new world order. Just that the bills reference a device like it, if not the same device

Again, the bill you cited explicitly named a life-saving or life-sustaining device. It not only mentions it, but refers to back to it again later. Unless you posted something else that elucidates anything in the way of RFID or other human tracking device, what you stated was nothing like an RFID.

[mattmatumbo]

Now I understand what "NAOH" is haha.

[mattmatumbo]

This thread was good for a laugh. caveBEAR has given me a new tool: "Noah." We can probably just lock this down.

[mattmatumbo]

Originally Posted by NewAgeofHorus

It states that it can be used to analysis anything else deemed necessary by the secretary. A pacemaker doesn't cant do that

Who is the secretary? The analyses listed, based on syntax and diction, referred to the device(s), not to analysis of the patient. Aside from "surveys by the patient." And how is this not slippery slope?

[mattmatumbo]

Occam's razor sorted this out for me.

[mattmatumbo]

Originally Posted by bladerdude360

+1

I read your post and had to bump the idea. I think everyone but Noah is using it haha.